INTRODUCTION:

Ward rounds are structured clinical visits that involve a team of healthcare professionals assessing and discussing the care of patients within a hospital or healthcare facility.¹The primary purpose of ward rounds is to ensure comprehensive and coordinated patient care through collaboration among various team members. During these rounds, healthcare providers review patient histories, discuss diagnoses, evaluate treatment plans, and make necessary adjustments based on the latest clinical findings and patient needs.²

At their core, ward rounds serve several essential functions. They facilitate effective communication among team members, enabling a holistic understanding of each patient's condition. By fostering collaboration, ward rounds also enhance decision-making processes, ensuring that diverse perspectives contribute to care strategies. Furthermore, these rounds provide an opportunity for ongoing education, as less experienced staff can learn from their more seasoned colleagues through real-time discussions and assessments.^3,4

Moreover, ward rounds can significantly impact patient engagement. By involving patients in discussions about their care - when appropriate - healthcare professionals can empower individuals to take an active role in their treatment. This approach not only improves patient satisfaction but also promotes adherence to treatment plans, ultimately enhancing health outcomes.

Historical Context and Evolution of Ward Rounds:

The practice of conducting ward rounds has deep historical roots, dating back to the early days of medicine. Initially, ward rounds were primarily led by physicians who would assess patients and determine treatment plans without much input from other healthcare professionals. This hierarchical approach reflected the traditional physician-centric model of healthcare, where the physician's authority dictated the flow of information and decision-making. Over the years, the evolution of medical practice and the growing recognition of the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration have transformed the nature of ward rounds.^5,6The introduction of nursing as a distinct profession brought about a shift in dynamics, emphasizing the vital role of nurses in patient care. This change has led to more inclusive ward rounds, where nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare providers actively participate in discussions, contributing their insights and expertise. In recent decades, advancements in medical technology and the rise of evidence-based medicine have further influenced the conduct of ward rounds. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) and decision-support systems has streamlined information sharing, allowing healthcare teams to access real-time data during rounds.^7,8This shift has made ward rounds more efficient and has enhanced the quality of clinical discussions by ensuring that all team members have access to the most relevant information.⁹

Today, ward rounds can vary significantly in structure and composition, reflecting the diverse needs of patients and the healthcare setting. They can range from traditional medical rounds to more specialized formats, such as nursing rounds focused on care delivery or interdisciplinary rounds that incorporate various healthcare professionals.

Types of Ward Rounds:

Ward rounds can be categorized into several types, each serving specific purposes and involving different team dynamics. Among these types, the role of pharmacists is increasingly recognized as vital, particularly in interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary rounds. Their expertise enhances medication management, promotes patient safety, and contributes to overall care quality.^1,10,11,12

Medical Rounds:

In traditional medical rounds, pharmacists may not always be present; however, their inclusion is becoming more common. During these rounds, physicians typically lead discussions centered on patient diagnosis, treatment plans, and clinical assessments. When pharmacists participate, they provide valuable insights related to pharmacotherapy. They can assess medication regimens for appropriateness, identify potential drug interactions, and recommend alternatives based on the latest evidence. This collaboration helps ensure that medication-related issues are addressed promptly, thereby improving patient outcomes and minimizing adverse drug events.

By actively participating in medical rounds, pharmacists help bridge the gap between clinical decision-making and medication management. Their expertise allows for a more comprehensive understanding of how medications fit into the overall treatment plan, ultimately leading to better-informed decisions that prioritize patient safety and efficacy.¹³

In the context of medical rounds, several specific types of rounds can be distinguished, including resident rounds, associate rounds, senior doctor rounds, and Head of Department (HOD) rounds. Each type has its unique structure and purpose, and the role of pharmacists can vary accordingly. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for appreciating how pharmacists contribute to patient care in different settings.

Resident Rounds:

Resident rounds are typically conducted by medical residents under the supervision of attending physicians. These rounds provide an opportunity for residents to present cases, discuss patient management strategies, and receive feedback from their supervisors. During resident rounds, pharmacists can play a pivotal role by providing clinical expertise on medication management.

Pharmacists attending resident rounds can assist residents in formulating effective treatment plans by evaluating current medication regimens for appropriateness. They can identify potential drug interactions, suggest alternative therapies, and provide insights on dosing adjustments based on individual patient factors. By doing so, pharmacists not only enhance the educational experience for residents but also help ensure that medication-related issues are addressed early in the treatment process. Their involvement encourages a more collaborative approach to patient care and fosters an environment where learning and patient safety go hand in hand.

Associate Rounds:

Associate rounds are typically conducted by mid-level providers, such as nurse practitioners or physician assistants, who may oversee specific patient groups. These rounds are focused on continuity of care and often involve a more streamlined decision-making process. Pharmacists can be integral during associate rounds by offering their expertise in pharmacotherapy to ensure optimal medication management.

During these rounds, pharmacists can work closely with associate providers to review patient medications, assess therapeutic efficacy, and identify any safety concerns. Their participation ensures that medication reviews are comprehensive and that any issues related to pharmacotherapy are promptly addressed. This collaborative effort enhances patient care, as it combines the clinical knowledge of associate providers with the specialized medication management skills of pharmacists.

Senior Doctor Rounds:

Senior doctor rounds are typically led by attending physicians or senior consultants who oversee complex cases. These rounds often involve discussions about critical patients and significant clinical decisions. The presence of pharmacists during senior doctor rounds is especially valuable, as they can provide insights into the medication-related aspects of complex cases.

Pharmacists participating in senior doctor rounds can present findings related to pharmacotherapy, discuss patient adherence, and offer recommendations for medication adjustments based on the latest clinical guidelines. Their expertise can also help identify potential barriers to effective treatment, such as drug availability or patient-specific factors affecting adherence. By actively engaging in discussions, pharmacists contribute to a more comprehensive approach to patient care, ensuring that medication management aligns with overall treatment goals.¹⁴

Head of Department (HOD) Rounds:

HOD rounds are often focused on administrative and strategic discussions related to patient care within a department. These rounds may involve high-level decision-making about patient management, resource allocation, and departmental policies. While pharmacists may not participate in every HOD round, their input can be invaluable when medication management is a key focus. In HOD rounds, pharmacists can provide insights into the implications of medication policies, suggest improvements for formulary management, and address medication safety initiatives. Their presence can help ensure that clinical decisions align with best practices in pharmacotherapy, enhancing the overall quality of care delivered by the department. Additionally, pharmacists can advocate for the integration of medication management strategies that consider patient safety and clinical efficacy. ^(1,15)

Nursing Rounds:

Nursing rounds are conducted primarily by nursing staff, often at the bedside, where they engage directly with patients. While pharmacists may not lead these rounds, their collaboration with nurses is crucial. Nurses can identify patients who may benefit from a medication review or education, prompting pharmacists to provide targeted interventions. For example, during nursing rounds, if a nurse notices a patient experiencing side effects from a medication, they can consult with the pharmacist for advice on managing those side effects or adjusting the treatment plan.

Pharmacists also play a supportive role by offering educational resources to nurses, enabling them to better communicate medication-related information to patients. This collaboration enhances patient satisfaction and fosters an environment where patients feel empowered to discuss their medications and concerns.

Interdisciplinary Rounds:

Interdisciplinary rounds are characterized by their collaborative nature, bringing together a diverse team of healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, and therapists. In this setting, pharmacists play a critical role in comprehensive care planning. Their expertise in pharmacotherapy allows them to assess how medications impact patient outcomes and interact with other treatment modalities.

During interdisciplinary rounds, pharmacists contribute to discussions about medication management, ensuring that all aspects of a patient’s treatment are carefully considered. They can provide insights on dosage adjustments, potential drug interactions, and the appropriateness of prescribed therapies based on the patient's clinical status. This collaborative approach promotes holistic care, where the patient's physical, psychological, and social needs are all taken into account.

Moreover, pharmacists help ensure that the medication therapy aligns with evidence-based guidelines, providing a strong foundation for clinical decision-making. Their presence in interdisciplinary rounds encourages mutual respect and teamwork, fostering a culture of collaboration that ultimately benefits patient care. ^16,17

Multidisciplinary Rounds:

Similar to interdisciplinary rounds, multidisciplinary rounds involve a team of healthcare professionals from various disciplines. However, these rounds often focus on specific patient populations or conditions, such as surgical or oncology teams. Pharmacists are particularly valuable in these contexts, as they bring specialized knowledge about medication management specific to the patient population being discussed.

In multidisciplinary rounds, pharmacists can address complex cases that require input from multiple specialists. For instance, in oncology rounds, pharmacists can discuss chemotherapy regimens, dosing strategies, and supportive care measures. Their expertise is essential for managing the unique challenges associated with cancer treatment, including side effects, drug interactions, and adherence issues. ^18,19

By actively engaging in multidisciplinary rounds, pharmacists help ensure that all aspects of a patient’s medication therapy are evaluated, contributing to more effective and personalized treatment strategies.

Virtual Rounds:

The rise of telemedicine has led to the emergence of virtual rounds, where healthcare teams conduct assessments and discussions remotely. Pharmacists can play a significant role in virtual rounds, leveraging technology to maintain their presence in patient care discussions. This is particularly beneficial in situations where physical presence is challenging, such as during a pandemic or in rural healthcare settings.

In virtual rounds, pharmacists can provide medication reviews, offer recommendations, and engage in discussions about patient care via video conferencing or other digital platforms. This approach enhances accessibility, allowing pharmacists to collaborate with the healthcare team and address medication-related issues without the need for physical presence.

Furthermore, virtual rounds can facilitate education for patients about their medications, enabling pharmacists to provide counseling remotely. This flexibility ensures that patient care remains uninterrupted and that critical medication management continues despite logistical challenges.²⁰

Benefits of Active Participation in Ward Rounds:

Active participation in ward rounds has a profound influence on patient outcomes, making it a crucial element in contemporary healthcare practices. Numerous studies underscore the correlation between effective ward round participation and improved clinical results, including reduced lengths of hospital stays, lower readmission rates, and enhanced patient safety and care quality. This connection highlights the importance of collaborative teamwork among healthcare professionals.

Improved Communication Among Healthcare Providers:

One of the most profound advantages of active participation in ward rounds is the enhancement of communication among healthcare providers. In traditional models, information often flowed in a top-down manner, with senior clinicians making decisions based on limited input from other team members. However, inclusive ward rounds encourage dialogue and facilitate the exchange of ideas and perspectives.²¹

When healthcare professionals participate actively, they can discuss individual patient needs in detail, share observations from their specific roles, and voice concerns that may otherwise be overlooked. For instance, nurses may provide insights into a patient’s daily behavior or emotional state, while pharmacists can highlight potential medication interactions or side effects. This multifaceted communication not only enriches the clinical picture but also allows for more informed decisions regarding treatment strategies.

Moreover, improved communication helps to build trust and rapport among team members. When all voices are valued, it creates an environment of mutual respect and collaboration, essential for effective teamwork. This cohesive approach minimizes the likelihood of misunderstandings and enhances the overall efficiency of care delivery. ²²

Enhanced Patient Engagement and Satisfaction:

Active participation in ward rounds also translates into enhanced patient engagement and satisfaction. When healthcare professionals involve patients in discussions about their care—when appropriate—it empowers patients to take an active role in their treatment journey. This involvement can lead to increased adherence to treatment plans and a better understanding of health conditions.

During ward rounds, patients can ask questions, express concerns, and provide their perspectives on treatment options. This two-way communication fosters a sense of ownership over their care and reinforces the importance of shared decision-making. When patients feel heard and valued, their overall satisfaction with the healthcare experience improves significantly.

Furthermore, engaged patients are more likely to adhere to prescribed therapies and lifestyle changes, leading to better health outcomes. Studies have shown that patient involvement in care decisions can reduce anxiety and enhance their commitment to treatment. Consequently, active participation in ward rounds not only benefits patient satisfaction but also contributes to improved health metrics, such as reduced readmission rates and shorter hospital stays.²³

Better Decision-Making and Care Coordination:

The collaborative nature of ward rounds leads to better decision-making and enhanced care coordination. When healthcare providers from various disciplines come together to discuss patient cases, they bring unique insights and expertise that contribute to more holistic treatment plans. This diversity of thought is particularly crucial in complex cases, where multiple factors must be considered. For example, in interdisciplinary rounds involving physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, treatment decisions are made based on a comprehensive understanding of both medical and pharmacological perspectives. This approach minimizes the risk of medication errors and ensures that all aspects of a patient’s health - physical, mental, and social - are taken into account. Additionally, effective care coordination is achieved through active participation in ward rounds. When healthcare professionals work collaboratively, they can streamline patient management, ensuring that all necessary follow-up actions are clear and assigned to the appropriate team members. This organized approach helps avoid duplication of efforts and reduces the risk of gaps in care.²⁴

Involving multiple professionals in the decision-making process also promotes accountability. Each team member understands their responsibilities, making it easier to track progress and ensure that patient needs are met in a timely manner. This structured coordination enhances the overall quality of care and fosters a seamless patient experience.

Impact of Ward Round Participation on Patient Outcomes:

Active participation in ward rounds is essential for enhancing patient outcomes in healthcare settings. These structured meetings, where multidisciplinary teams gather to discuss and manage patient care, have been shown to significantly influence various clinical metrics, including length of hospital stays, readmission rates, and overall patient safety. Understanding the impact of ward round participation on patient outcomes is crucial for developing effective healthcare practices that prioritize patient well-being.

Improved Length of Stay:

One of the most notable impacts of active participation in ward rounds is the reduction in length of hospital stays. Studies have demonstrated that when healthcare teams collaborate during ward rounds, they can make more timely and informed decisions regarding patient management. This is particularly important for complex cases where multiple healthcare providers contribute unique insights. For example, a study in a tertiary care facility revealed that the integration of pharmacists into daily rounds led to earlier identification of medication-related issues. Consequently, patients could receive more effective therapies sooner, resulting in a 20% reduction in average length of stay.²⁵

Effective communication among team members during ward rounds also facilitates quicker discharge planning. By aligning on a cohesive treatment strategy, healthcare providers can streamline processes and ensure that all necessary interventions are completed before a patient is discharged. This proactive approach minimizes delays and enhances the overall efficiency of care delivery.

Lower Readmission Rates:

Another significant outcome linked to ward round participation is the reduction in readmission rates. Engaging a multidisciplinary team during rounds allows for comprehensive discharge planning, which is critical for preventing complications that might lead to readmission. Research has shown that hospitals employing structured ward rounds experience significantly lower readmission rates for chronic conditions, such as heart failure and diabetes.⁽²⁶⁾

For instance, a hospital that implemented interdisciplinary rounds, involving nurses, physicians, and case managers, reported a 30% decrease in readmissions within 30 days of discharge. The collaborative discussions enabled healthcare providers to address potential barriers to adherence, such as medication management and follow-up appointments, ensuring that patients leave with a clear understanding of their care plans.²⁷

Enhanced Patient Safety and Quality of Care:

Patient safety is paramount in healthcare, and the role of active participation in ward rounds cannot be overstated. These rounds provide an opportunity for healthcare professionals to discuss potential safety concerns and devise strategies to mitigate risks. Studies have shown that multidisciplinary rounds lead to a decrease in adverse events, such as medication errors and complications.²⁸

Moreover, the emphasis on teamwork and communication during ward rounds fosters a culture of safety within healthcare settings. When all team members feel empowered to share their insights and concerns, the likelihood of oversight diminishes, leading to higher-quality care and better patient outcomes.

Barriers to Effective Ward Round Participation:

Ward rounds are essential for optimizing patient care, yet various barriers can impede effective participation among healthcare professionals. Identifying these challenges is crucial for implementing strategies that enhance collaboration and improve patient outcomes. The obstacles can be categorized into systemic, interpersonal, and organizational factors, each contributing to inefficiencies observed during ward rounds.^29,30,31

A. Systemic Challenges:

A major barrier to effective ward round participation is systemic constraints, especially related to time management. Healthcare professionals often juggle demanding schedules filled with patient care, administrative duties, and other obligations. This time pressure can result in rushed rounds, which limits the potential for meaningful discussion and collaborative decision-making. Research indicates that hurried ward rounds can lead to overlooked critical information, ultimately impacting patient care negatively.

Additionally, inadequate staffing can worsen this issue. In settings with prevalent staff shortages, the burden on existing team members can lead to fatigue and diminished motivation. As healthcare professionals feel overwhelmed, their willingness to engage actively in ward rounds may decline. When team members are stretched thin, opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration diminish, resulting in fragmented care and suboptimal patient outcomes.

B. Interpersonal Dynamics:

Interpersonal dynamics also significantly influence the effectiveness of ward rounds. Hierarchical structures within healthcare teams can create an environment where certain voices are prioritized over others. For instance, junior staff or allied health professionals might hesitate to share their insights during rounds due to perceived power imbalances. This reluctance can prevent valuable information from being communicated, ultimately hindering comprehensive decision-making.

Moreover, differences in communication styles can further complicate interactions among team members. Variations in training and professional backgrounds may lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of information shared during rounds. When effective communication is lacking, critical patient information may be lost, increasing the risk of safety issues and leading to poorer health outcomes.

C. Organizational Factors:

The organizational culture significantly affects the success of ward rounds. A culture that does not emphasize collaboration and teamwork can create an environment where participation is limited. In institutions where silos exist between departments or disciplines, healthcare professionals may feel isolated and less inclined to engage actively in interdisciplinary discussions.

Furthermore, the absence of standardized protocols for conducting ward rounds can lead to inefficiencies. Without a consistent structure, confusion regarding roles and responsibilities can arise. If expectations for each team member's contributions during rounds are unclear, valuable input may be overlooked, diminishing the overall quality of care provided.

Technology presents both opportunities and challenges for ward round participation. While electronic health records (EHRs) can enhance information sharing, excessive reliance on technology may detract from face-to-face communication. When team members prioritize data entry over meaningful dialogue, the collaborative spirit of ward rounds can suffer.

D. Strategies for Improvement:

To effectively address these barriers, a multifaceted approach is necessary. First, healthcare institutions should prioritize adequate staffing and time management, enabling comprehensive ward rounds. Implementing structured protocols for rounds can enhance organization and ensure that all team members have the opportunity to contribute.

Fostering a culture of collaboration is essential. Training programs that emphasize the value of interdisciplinary teamwork can empower all team members to share their insights confidently. Encouraging open communication and actively seeking input from junior staff and allied health professionals can cultivate a more inclusive environment.

Lastly, technology should be leveraged to enhance, rather than replace, interpersonal interactions. Organizations can invest in tools that facilitate real-time communication while ensuring that face-to-face discussions remain a central component of ward rounds.

By recognizing and addressing systemic, interpersonal, and organizational barriers, healthcare teams can enhance the effectiveness of ward rounds. Improving participation in these critical discussions ultimately leads to better patient care, improved outcomes, and a more collaborative healthcare environment.

Skills for Effective Ward Round Participation:

· Clinical Knowledge: Possess a thorough understanding of various medical conditions, treatment protocols, and the nuances of patient care, allowing you to contribute effectively to discussions about patient management.

· Communication Skills: Demonstrate the ability to articulate patient information clearly and concisely, fostering an open dialogue with both colleagues and patients to enhance understanding and collaboration.

· Critical Thinking: Employ analytical skills to assess patient data, identify potential issues, and formulate evidence-based recommendations that can lead to better patient outcomes.

· Team Collaboration: Cultivate a spirit of teamwork by actively participating in a multidisciplinary setting, recognizing the strengths of each team member, and working harmoniously towards common goals.

· Time Management: Prioritize tasks efficiently during ward rounds to ensure that all patients are reviewed in a timely manner, thereby optimizing the flow of the round and respecting everyone’s schedules.

· Empathy and Patient Interaction: Engage with patients in a compassionate manner, taking the time to listen to their concerns and providing reassurance, which can significantly enhance their overall experience and satisfaction.

· Documentation Skills: Ensure that all relevant findings and updates are meticulously recorded in patient charts, facilitating continuity of care and providing an accurate reference for future discussions.

Future Directions and Research Needs:

As the healthcare landscape evolves, so too must the practices surrounding ward rounds to address the increasing complexities of patient care. Future research and innovative approaches in this domain are critical for enhancing the efficacy of ward rounds, which in turn can lead to significant improvements in patient outcomes. Several key areas warrant focused exploration.

· Integration of Technology: One of the foremost avenues for advancement is the integration of technology within the ward round framework. Although electronic health records (EHRs) have substantially improved data accessibility, there remains considerable potential for further enhancements. For instance, the implementation of clinical decision-support systems and advanced analytics can empower healthcare teams to make informed, evidence-based decisions during rounds. Investigating the effectiveness and usability of these technological tools can elucidate best practices while identifying barriers to their integration. Such research is crucial for augmenting patient safety and elevating the overall quality of care provided.

· Patient-Centered Approaches: A pivotal area for future inquiry involves the integration of patient feedback and engagement into ward round processes. The paradigm of patient-centered care has gained significant traction, emphasizing the importance of incorporating patients' voices in their treatment discussions. Exploring methodologies for effectively including patients in decision-making processes can enhance engagement and satisfaction. Future studies should evaluate the impact of this involvement on clinical outcomes, overall patient experiences, and the therapeutic alliance between healthcare providers and patients.

· Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The dynamics of interdisciplinary collaboration during ward rounds necessitate further investigation. Research should aim to identify optimal team compositions and interaction patterns that facilitate open communication and shared decision-making. Studies could also evaluate targeted training programs designed to enhance collaborative competencies among healthcare professionals. Furthermore, understanding the distinct roles of various team members in contributing to patient outcomes can lead to more effective deployment of each professional's expertise, thereby optimizing care delivery.

· Standardization of Practices: The standardization of ward round practices represents another crucial area for future research. Developing evidence-based protocols that delineate best practices for conducting rounds across diverse healthcare settings is imperative. Investigating the efficacy of these standardized protocols in enhancing operational efficiency and fostering effective communication among team members is essential. By establishing a cohesive framework for ward rounds, healthcare organizations can improve consistency and quality in patient care delivery.

· Longitudinal Studies on Outcomes: Finally, longitudinal studies that assess the long-term impacts of ward round participation on patient outcomes are vital. While immediate benefits, such as reductions in length of stay and readmission rates, have been documented, comprehensive research is needed to elucidate the sustained effects of effective ward rounds on patient health over time. Such studies can provide critical insights into the correlation between consistent participation in multidisciplinary rounds and enhanced health outcomes, along with increased patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION:

In summary, the future of ward rounds is rife with potential, underpinned by opportunities for research and innovation. By prioritizing the integration of technology, adopting patient-centered approaches, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, standardizing practices, and conducting longitudinal studies, healthcare systems can markedly enhance the efficacy of ward rounds. Addressing these dimensions will not only yield improved patient outcomes but also cultivate a culture of collaboration and continuous professional development among healthcare providers. Embracing these future directions is essential for transforming ward rounds into a more dynamic and impactful facet of patient care, ultimately enriching the healthcare experience for both providers and patients alike.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCE:

1. Parthasarathi G, Nyfort-Hansen K, Nahata MC, editors. A Textbook of Clinical Pharmacy Practice: Essential Concepts and Skills. Universities Press; 2012.

2. Stone P, Curtis SJ. Pharmacy Practice. 3rd ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Deutscher Apotheker Verlag; 2002.

3. Barclay SM, Jeffres MN, Bhakta R. Educational card games to teach pharmacotherapeutics in an advanced pharmacy practice experience. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(2):33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe75233

4. Smith J, Brown A. The impact of interdisciplinary rounds on patient outcomes. J Healthc Qual. 2021; 43(5): 234–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhq.2021.03.012

5. Johnson L, Williams R. Enhancing communication in healthcare teams. Am J Med Qual. 2022;37(3):201–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10628606211012345

6. Babu D, Rowett D, Lim R, Marotti S, Wisdom A, Ellett LK. Clinical pharmacists’ participation in ward rounds in hospitals: responses from a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract. 2023; 31(4): 409–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad028

7. Babu D, Marotti S, Rowett D, Lim R, Wisdom A, Kalisch Ellett L. What is impacting clinical pharmacists’ participation in an interprofessional ward round: a thematic analysis of a national survey. J Interprof Care. 2024; 38(3): 444–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2289506

8. Babu D, Rowett D, Lim R, Marotti S, Wisdom A, Ellett LK. Clinical pharmacists’ participation in ward rounds in hospitals: responses from a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract. 2023; 31(4): 409–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad028

9. Korayem GB, Badreldin HA, Eljaaly K, Aldemerdash A, Al-Suhaibani LK, Joharji H, et al. Clinical pharmacy definition, required education, training and practice in Saudi Arabia: A position statement by the Saudi society of clinical pharmacy. Saudi Pharm J . 2021; 29(11): 1343–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.09.008

10. Noble C, Brazil V, Teasdale T, Forbes M, Billett S. Developing junior doctors’ prescribing practices through collaborative practice: Sustaining and transforming the practice of communities. J Interprof Care. 2017; 31(2): 263–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1254164

11. Zamanzadeh V, Orujlu S, Beykmirza R, Ghofrani M. Barriers for nurse participation in multidisciplinary ward rounds: An integrative review. Nurs Pract Today. 2021; http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/npt.v8i2.5120

12. Rotman-Pikielny P, Rabin B, Amoyal S, Mushkat Y, Zissin R, Levy Y. Participation of family members in ward rounds: Attitude of medical staff, patients and relatives. Patient Educ Coins. 2007; 65(2):166–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.003

13. Ward P. Participation and mediation: A practical theology for the liquid church. London, England: SCM Press; 2008.

14. Walton V, Hogden A, Johnson J, Greenfield D. Ward rounds, participants, roles and perceptions: literature review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016; 29(4): 364–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-04-2015-0053

15. Ker J, Cantillon P, Ambrose L. Teaching on a ward round. BMJ. 2008;337(dec02 1): a1930–a1930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1930

16. Redley B, McTier L, Botti M, Hutchinson A, Newnham H, Campbell D, et al. Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28(1): 15–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292

17. Sello DA, Dambisya YM. Views of pharmacists on involvement in ward rounds in selected public hospitals in Limpopo Province. Health SA Gesondheid. 2014; 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v19i1.740

18. Yap M, Edwards G, Gibbs H, Newnham H, Hancock N, Tong EY. A cohort study comparing pharmacist activities during participation in general medical ward rounds: telehealth versus in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(2): 522–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01701-5

19. Gilliland N, Catherwood N, Chen S, Browne P, Wilson J, Burden H. Ward round template: enhancing patient safety on ward rounds. BMJ Open Qual. 2018;7(2): e000170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000170

20. Holzhüter F, Schuster F, Heres S, Hamann J. Clinical decision-making during psychiatric ward rounds. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.721699

21. Hale G, McNab D. Developing a ward round checklist to improve patient safety. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015;4(1): u204775.w2440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u204775.w2440

22. Chen M, Thompson G. The role of pharmacists in ward rounds. Pharm Pact. 2021;19(4):1234–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics19041234

23. Taylor S, Green H. Barriers to effective communication in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07854-8

24. Baker R, Hall K. Clinical rounds and patient outcomes: A review. J Hosp Med. 2020;15(12):725–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3383

25. Martinez E, Simmons J. The effect of ward rounds on clinical outcomes. BMJ Open. 2021;11(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042309

26. Kim T, Choi Y. Strategies for improving ward round efficiency. J Healthc Manga. 2022; 67(3): 180–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10901415211023145

27. Aylor D, Green T. Impact of team-based care on patient satisfaction. J Health Commun. 2020; 25(10): 786–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1830591

28. Edwards J, Morgan T. The future of ward rounds: Innovations and challenges. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021; 30(5): 388–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012345

29. Singh P, Patel R. Enhancing communication through structured rounds. J Patient Saf. 2020; 16(4): 201–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000275

30. All M, Becker L. Evaluating the effectiveness of ward round protocols. J Nurs Care Qual. 2022; 37(1): 56–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000546

31. Oliver P, White B. Best practices for conducting effective ward rounds. Qual Manag Health Care. 2020; 29: 76–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000254

Received on 01.11.2024 Revised on 28.11.2024

Accepted on 18.12.2024 Published on 10.03.2025

Available online from March 21, 2025

Research J. Science and Tech. 2025; 17(1):77-85.

DOI: 10.52711/2349-2988.2025.00011

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.